This article is the first of a two part series which details the coming war. This war will not be a simple war of occupation such as what we saw in Iran and presently in Afghanistan. This war will be utterly devastating and has the potential to escalate into a conflict befitting the over-used term, “Armageddon”.
Part one of this series will present what
boxing fans call, “the tale of tape”. The “tale of the tape” entails
identifying the combatants, their respective sides as well as the
relative strengths of the participants and their military forces.
The Relative Strengths of Each Side
The coming war will largely feature what
pundits call the BRIC nations and the USA and her allies. Each side of
this coming conflict possesses widely divergent military strengths,
weaknesses and strategies.
The US Is Dependent On a Devastating First Strike Attack
The United States and her allies have a
decided advantage of quick strike, long range battlefield capabilities
because of superior aircraft and carrier strike capabilities. The BRIC
nations have an advantage with manpower, rocket propelled weapons and
tanks. The USA and her allies cannot win a sustained battlefield
campaign because of the attrition factor. The Chinese have demonstrated
the ability to negate the United States Navy’s technological advantage
through the use of killer satellites. Therefore, the entire US strategy
is predicated on a first strike before the Chinese can destroy the
majority of the eyes and ears of the US military, namely, its superior
satellite capabilities in which the US forces can quickly locate and
destroy the enemy with its smart weapons before the enemy knows what hit
them.
Nuclear Submarines Are the “X Factor”
Nuclear submarines are often looked at as the
great equalizer. No matter who is winning on the ground, in the air and
on the surface of the oceans, the submarine force has the capability to
reign down unimaginable destruction upon their enemy. In the case of
submarines, the USA and her allies are matched by their BRIC
counterparts. Most subs carry eight nuclear missiles, each capable of
destroying a major city. The USA presumably has superior evasive
techniques and therefore, would presumably survive sub-killer strategies
with greater frequency that their BRIC adversaries. Therefore, the BRIC
nations might win every land battle, however, the victorious BRIC
nations would not have many of its cities left to return to in the case
of a nuclear war. The US submarines are, in effect,
a formidable doomsday weapon.
The Trigger Event
For the United States and her allies to win a
conventional war, a quick strike, surprise engagement is critical to
the success of these forces. The BRICS would have an advantage in a
longer prolonged conflict.This is particularly true when one considers
that if time permitted, the Chinese have bragged that they could put 100
million men on a battlefield. Following the teachings of Sun Tsu in the
famous book, The Art of War, it is critical that the BRIC nations be brought to the battlefield of choice by the USA for a quick and decisive engagement.
From a conventional warfare standpoint, the
engagement is likely to be naval and involve aircraft. This plays to the
advantage to the USA, whose superior long range strike capability is
enhanced by their superior aircraft carriers.The USA forces would likely
engage in a distracting land engagement first to hold and occupy the
maximum number of the BRIC forces. The land strike, a first strike, will
be directed at Syria. Given the present crisis, the Russians would have
to decide on choosing between protecting its eastern border with the
NATO forces poised to attack, or launching an offensive directed at
protecting Syria. The Russians will choose self-defense. The timing of
the American invasion of Syria will take place when a sufficient number
of American naval vessels are present in the Black Sea to checkmate the
Russia military build up in Crimea which would serve as a staging area
for military action in Syria. At the end of the day, once a large
contingent of the American navy has moved into position off of the
Baltic states, Russia will be powerless to prevent an US takeover of
Syria. The path and progress of the CIA force ,ISIS, as it creates more
designed havoc in Syria, will provide the impetus for US forces to enter
Syria, thus provoking a Russian and a BRIC nation unified response.
Conventional wisdom states that once the US
occupies Syria, Russia will be powerless to intervene on behalf of
America’s next target, Iran because the US medium range missile
batteries will prevent the Russian army from moving south into the
region. With Russia out of the way, Iran will capitulate and stop
selling oil for gold to the BRIC nations and the Petrodollar will be
preserved. Iran will agree to the control of their oil fields by the US
to avoid an invasion. They will capitulate because nobody will come to
their rescue. At least that is what the US is hoping for. In part two, I
will present a more likely scenario.
What about India and China? Won’t they move
to protect Iran and thus, erode the Petrodollar? Not exactly, as China
and India will have their hands full. The naval strike that I speak of
will be directed at China. Before the commencement of hostilities, China
will be given a short time to stand down or face destruction by the US
submarines and the long range capabilities of US carriers. It is only
necessary to target China’s major cities to force capitulation. This
strategy would free the disenchanted Chinese, living in the rebellious
outlying provinces to launch a revolution against Beijing. It is also
rumored that the US does have space based nuclear weapons. If this is
the case, this conflict could be over in the early morning hours of the
first day. The Chinese submarine force could be capable of taking out
several US cities, however, their submarines alone will not change the
outcome. India will be held in check by Pakistan. Subsequently, India
will never enter the fight. US forces in Afghanistan could block a
Russian invasion of Pakistan from the north. It is clear that the USA
and her allies will decisively defeat the BRIC nations in a conventional
war, so long as it is a short conflict.
However, there is one game-changing strategy
that the BRICS could employ. If the BRIC nations were to simultaneously
launch a series of high altitude ICBM’s over every theater of potential
war, the high altitude nuclear blast could create an EMP attack on a
global scale. Such an action would negate the technological advantage of
the US military and reduce the conflict to brutal savagery which would
be dominated by global famine. Certainly the super elite would
experience their much-coveted population reduction on an unprecedented
scale. This action would ultimately produce a military stalemate and the
war would disintegrate into one brute force versus another for a very
long time. The former popular TV show, Revolution, comes to
mind. More on the trigger event along with a more detailed chronology
will be presented in the next part of this series.
The Tale of the Tape: The BRICS vs. the USA and Her Allies
BRIC Nations Conventional Military Strength
Most Likely to Fight
Men Planes Tanks Carriers Subs Rockets
Russia 766,000 3,082 1,550 1 62 3,781
China 2,825,000 2,788 9,150 1 69 1,770
India 1,325,000 1,785 3,569 2 17 292
Total 4,916, 000 7,655 14,269 4 148 5,843
(NOTE: The forces of North Korea would be absorbed by China
Ukraine and Belarus have a combined military strength of 200,000 men)
USA Allied Nations Conventional Military Strength
Men Planes Tanks Carriers Subs Rockets
USA 1,430,000 13,685 8,325 10 72 1,330
UK 205,330 900 400 1 11 60
FR 230,000 1,200 420 1 10 60
GRM 180,000 710 410 0 4 250
TURK 410,500 990 3,660 0 14 650
S KOR 640,000 1,400 2,350 0 14 250
JAP 250,000 1,600 770 1 16 100
TOT 3,345,830 20,475 8,325 13 141 2,700
Source: Global Fire Power
NUCLEAR WEAPONS: BRIC NATIONS VS USA & ALLIES
The nuclear arsenals of the BRICS vs. the USA
and her allies are equivalent on paper. However, the reliability
factor, related to the weapons, clearly favors the USA. To the sane
person, the topic of nuclear war is almost a moot point. If either side
resorts to the use of nuclear weapons on anything more than a
battlefield scale with tactical nuclear weapons, this would render the
conflict meaningless as the planet would be a very undesirable place to
inhabit. Then again, the psychopathic elite, safely tucked away in the
tunnels beneath Denver International Airport, may feel they have the
ability to wait out the devastation going on above. The following data
demonstrates the ultimate futility of employing nuclear weapons on a
regional and intercontinental basis. Of course, recognizing the futility
of such utter destruction and hoping that this would serve as a
deterrent to the psychopathic bankers from starting such a conflict,
cannot be counted on. After all, if one’s ultimate goal is the
destruction and reduction of 90% of the human race, and a nuclear war
would constitute the level of chaos needed in order to bring forth “the
order of out chaos” which would be needed to usher in the New World
Order. This makes nuclear war more, not less likely!
Country |
Warheads active/total |
Date of first test |
AFFILIATION |
United States |
2,150 / 7,700
|
16 July 1945 (“Trinity“) | NATO |
Russia |
1,800 / 8,500
|
2 9 August 1949 (“RDS-1“) | NATO |
United Kingdom |
160 / 225
|
3 October 1952 (“Hurricane“) | NATO |
France |
290 / 300
|
13 February 1960 (“Gerboise Bleue“) | NATO |
China |
n.a. / 250
|
16 October 1964 (“596“) | BRIC |
India |
n.a. / 90–110
|
18 May 1974 (“Smiling Buddha“) | BRIC |
Pakistan |
n.a. / 100–120
|
28 May 1998 (“Chagai-I“) | UNDETERMINED |
North Korea |
n.a. / <10
|
9 October 2006 | BRIC (CHINA) |
Undeclared nuclear powers
|
|||
Israel |
n.a. / 60-200
|
Unknown (possibly 22 September 1979) | INDEPENDENT |
Source: Federation of American Scientists: Status of World Nuclear Forces”. Fas.org. Early 2013.
Country | Air base | Custodian | Warheads |
---|---|---|---|
Belgium | Kleine Brogel | 52nd Fighter Wing | 10~20 |
Germany | Büchel | 52nd Fighter Wing | 10~20 |
Italy | Ghedi Torre | 6th Fighter Wing | 40 |
Aviano | 31st Fighter Wing | 50 | |
Netherlands | Volkel | 52nd Fighter Wing | 10~20 |
Turkey | Incirlik | 39th Air Base Wing | 60~70 |
Total | 150~200 |
Source: Hans M. Kristensen (26 June 2008). “Status of U.S. Nuclear Weapons in Europe”.Federation of American Scientist
Conclusion
Your children picked a very
bad time to be born. The only winners in what is coming will be the
Satan-serving bankers who are bankrolling both sides of the coming
conflict.
It is the hope of this
author that these facts will demonstrate the utter destruction that
billions of innocent people on this planet face. Could these be the last
days before the Tribulation and ultimate judgment? Perhaps, but the
Bible cautions us that we will not know the exact time of the return of
Jesus. Certainly, the conditions are ripe for nuclear conflict and it
is all so tragic and avoidable.
Jesus
showed humanity over 2,000 years ago, who the real enemy of humanity
is. It is unquestoinably demonic but manifests itself in the human form
of a banker. Man was not meant to engage in banker wars of profit. No
wonder Jesus chased the money changers from the Temple with a whip. The
world needs an “Occupy Basel” movement, where the Bank of International
Settlements resides. Such a movement would be needed in order to save
humanity. These psychopathic bankers need to be imprisoned in order to
save humanity from complete destruction. Do not hold your breath,
martial law, followed by World War III, is probably unavoidable.
This Sunday evening at 9pm
Sunday, on August 31st, I welcome former, CIA operative Dr. Jim Garrow,
to discuss this and related topics.
About the Author
Dave Hodges is the host of the popular radio
talk show, which airs from 9 PM to Midnight (Central). The show can be
heard by clicking the following icon in the upper right hand corner of The Common Sense Show.
The Blueprint for World War III
Reviewed by Spencer Reports
on
3:54 pm
Rating:
No comments: